Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement expresses concern about the perceived erosion of checks and balances in the U.S. government, comparing it to the situation in Ukraine where public protest would occur if the judiciary failed. The tone is critical and suggests a call to action or awareness about the importance of maintaining democratic institutions.
- The statement does not directly harm others but could be seen as provocative, urging awareness of governmental issues.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement aims to promote understanding of the importance of checks and balances, though it could be more empathetic. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but criticizes the system, which is a form of constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight a societal issue, encouraging vigilance in democratic processes. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly discussing a public concern. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.