Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement uses a personal anecdote to highlight the importance of reason and evidence in public health discussions, specifically regarding smoking and lung cancer. It critiques the flawed logic of using individual anecdotes to dismiss scientific evidence.
- The statement does not use harmful language and instead focuses on promoting reason and evidence-based thinking, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By emphasizing the importance of reason, the statement promotes understanding and critical thinking, aligning with the principle of promoting empathy and compassion through informed discourse. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement critiques a type of argument rather than attacking individuals, aligning with the principle of engaging in constructive criticism without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly using the platform to advocate for reason and evidence in public health discussions. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.