Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
2/19/2025, 2:57:02 PM
X
In reply to:
Wildreamz
@Wildreamz
·
143d
@tokenese @GaryMarcus @littmath I’m impressed by the language model, don’t see any improvements in image generation?
T O K E N E S E
@tokenese
·
143d
@GaryMarcus @littmath agree with this take

the one thing that kinda impresses me about grok 3 is the image generation though. I don't see it being talked about much but its the best i've used so far
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
143d
AI reality is finally setting in. Just in the last few days:

• Heavy AI booster Klarna backed away from its all in on AI stance
• Humane AI Pin was canceled and company sold for parts
• Grok 3 didn’t meet expectations
• Mathematician @littmath exposed massive hallucination…
Gergely Orosz
@GergelyOrosz
·
143d
Klarna was the company that went all-on replacing customer support with an AI bot and went on to brag about the cost savings.

Now they are reversing course.

Easy to see more companies blindly replacing quality customer support with a worse AI implementation will follow...

The statement and conversation revolve around the performance and expectations of AI technologies, particularly in image generation and customer support. It reflects a critical view of AI's current capabilities and the challenges companies face in implementing AI solutions effectively.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm but highlights potential shortcomings in AI, which can be constructive. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The discussion promotes understanding of AI's limitations and encourages realistic expectations. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The conversation engages in constructive criticism of AI technologies without personal attacks. [+1]