In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
328d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
328d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
328d
The statement expresses support for Apple's stance against government demands for data access, framing it as a stand against tyranny. It aligns with a broader discussion on privacy, government overreach, and corporate responsibility.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses strong language ('tyranny') that could be seen as inflammatory. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding of privacy issues but does so in a polarizing manner.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement lacks constructive dialogue and uses strong language against the UK government. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- It uses influence to raise awareness about privacy concerns but does so in a divisive way. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.