In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
328d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
328d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
328d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
328d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the implications of government surveillance and privacy rights, particularly in relation to Apple's data protection policies and the UK's Investigatory Powers Act. The tone is critical of the UK government's actions, labeling them as 'tyranny' and 'totalitarian,' and praises Apple for resisting these demands.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as inflammatory, potentially causing harm by escalating tensions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It criticizes public figures and government actions, which could be seen as disrespectful, but it does not engage in personal attacks or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote awareness about privacy issues, which aligns with promoting understanding and empathy for those concerned about privacy rights. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of the UK government, but the language used is more accusatory than constructive, which could hinder dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.