Michael Schellenberger

The statement criticizes the UK government, labeling it as totalitarian in response to its demands for access to user data under the Investigatory Powers Act. The tone is accusatory and alarmist, suggesting a significant overreach by the government and supporting Apple's resistance to these demands.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement could be seen as harmful by using strong language like 'totalitarian,' which may not foster constructive dialogue. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It does not respect the dignity of the UK government, using derogatory language. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, instead using inflammatory language. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in personal attacks against the UK government, rather than constructive criticism. [-1]