Marianne Williamson

Rank 17 of 47

Score 83

@CFHeather If you think the firings they're doing now is going to help you in any way, shape or form, I have a bridge to sell you. On the other hand, while you might not feel you rely on govt, what they're doing is very likely to affect you too.

2/22/2025, 5:46:18 AM

In reply to:

𝙲𝙵𝙷𝚎𝚊𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛 🇺🇸

@CFHeather

@marwilliamson Most of us out here in the real world don’t rely on the Federal Government for safety, health, and well being.” But we have to work 4 months out of every year to pay for the excessively large government we have, or that government will put us in jail.

Marianne Williamson

@marwilliamson

Summarily firing people is bad enough.

Gutting agencies that are necessary to people's safety, health and well-being is bad enough.

But firing people who have had stellar performance reviews, telling them that their work was inadequate and below par is just cruel.

It's…

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the impact of government actions, specifically firings, on individuals and society. It challenges the notion that individuals are unaffected by government actions, suggesting that such actions have broader implications.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not directly harm others but uses a metaphor to express skepticism about the effectiveness of government actions. It maintains a critical tone without being overtly harmful.
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement attempts to promote understanding by highlighting the potential impact of government actions on individuals who may not perceive themselves as reliant on government services. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism by challenging the previous speaker's view. It avoids personal attacks and focuses on the implications of government actions. [+1]