In reply to:
Elite E Man
@Eman856
·
1d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
1d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing fiscal responsibility, tax cuts, and the potential motives behind government actions, which are public issues. The tone is critical and suggests a conspiracy-like intent behind government actions.
- The statement does not directly harm others but implies negative intentions of a group, which could be seen as harmful rhetoric. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech but attributes malicious intent to a group, which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it assumes nefarious motives without evidence. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead makes a broad accusation without engaging with opposing views. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that could be seen as irresponsible by making unsubstantiated claims. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.