Michael Schellenberger

Rank 41 of 47

Score -109

-4

It's been increasingly clear you don't care about the people of California. Now it's obvious your real passion is hearing yourself talk. Please, for everyone's sake, go do what you love: quit now and focus on your podcast. You were never equipped to have larger responsibilities.

2/26/2025, 9:31:55 PM

In reply to:

Michael Shellenberger

@shellenberger

328d

You cut fire prevention; LA burned. You spent $24 billion on homelessness; it rose 40%. You reduced penalties for violent crime; it's 31% higher in California than in the US as a whole. And instead of taking responsibility, you're trying to become an influencer. It's pathetic.

Gavin Newsom

@GavinNewsom

328d

Breaking news on the Menendez brothers case:

The statement is a critical response to a public figure, expressing dissatisfaction with their performance and suggesting they resign. It uses a sarcastic tone and personal attacks rather than focusing on constructive dialogue.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement violates the principle of doing no harm by using a sarcastic and dismissive tone. [-1]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
It does not respect the dignity of the individual, engaging in personal attacks rather than focusing on policy issues. [-1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement fails to engage in constructive criticism, opting for personal attacks instead of a reasoned argument. [-2]