Michael Schellenberger

Rank 42 of 47
|
Score -109
2/26/2025, 9:33:26 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
328d
It's been increasingly clear you don't care about the people of California. Now it's obvious your real passion is hearing yourself talk. Please, for everyone's sake, go do what you love: quit now and focus on your podcast. You were never equipped to have larger responsibilities.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
328d
You cut fire prevention; LA burned. You spent $24 billion on homelessness; it rose 40%. You reduced penalties for violent crime; it's 31% higher in California than in the US as a whole. And instead of taking responsibility, you're trying to become an influencer. It's pathetic.
Gavin Newsom
@GavinNewsom
·
328d
Breaking news on the Menendez brothers case:

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing significant public issues such as wildfire prevention, homelessness, and crime rates in California. It critiques the actions and priorities of a public figure, suggesting a lack of responsibility and effectiveness in governance.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to hold a public figure accountable, which can be seen as striving to do no harm by highlighting governance issues. However, the tone is accusatory and dismissive, which may not fully align with this principle.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in hate speech or harassment but uses a harsh tone that could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but does so in a personal and dismissive manner, which does not foster constructive dialogue. [-1]