Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
328d
In reply to:
The statement is sarcastic and dismissive, suggesting that Gavin Newsom should focus on podcasting rather than his political duties. It implies criticism of his priorities and effectiveness.
- The statement uses sarcasm, which can be seen as a minor violation of striving to do no harm, as it may undermine constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of the individual, engaging in a personal attack rather than addressing specific issues. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, opting for sarcasm and personal attack rather than substantive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.