Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64

The statement critiques OpenAI's current position in the AI market, focusing on the cost and performance of GPT-4.5 compared to competitors. It uses data from a graph to support claims about the model's inefficiency and lack of competitive advantage.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm but could impact OpenAI's reputation. It presents a critical view based on data, which is a legitimate form of public discourse.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement lacks empathy or compassion, focusing on criticism without suggesting improvements or understanding the challenges faced by OpenAI.ย [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by using data to support its claims, though it could be seen as harsh without offering solutions.ย [+1]