Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
In reply to:

The statement is part of a public discourse on the development and competitive landscape of AI models, specifically OpenAI's GPT models. It critiques OpenAI's progress and aligns with previous predictions about the company's trajectory.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm but is critical of OpenAI's progress, which is a common aspect of public discourse.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement lacks empathy and understanding, focusing on criticism rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but does not resort to personal attacks, maintaining a focus on the company's performance. [+1]