Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
2/28/2025, 11:47:10 PM
X
In reply to:
Jo
@JoJrobotics
·
131d
@kimmonismus Come on man he was right we waited 2 years for a flagship model only to get 4.5 which sometimes its worse than 4o yet x100 more expensive, pretraining is just done and openai at this time is just another Theranos
Chubby♨️
@kimmonismus
·
131d
https://x.com/kimmonismus/status…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
131d
A big surprise only to you and the many other OpenAI fans who refused to listen to me, when I patiently and endlessly explained that this would be exactly what would happen.

For the rest of us, this was all but inevitable.

The statement is part of a broader conversation critiquing OpenAI's GPT-4.5 model, comparing it unfavorably to previous versions and expressing disappointment in its performance and cost. The tone is critical and reflects dissatisfaction with the product, engaging in public discourse about the effectiveness and value of AI models.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but contributes to a critical discussion about a public issue, which is the performance of AI models.
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism of OpenAI's product but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the product's performance and cost. [+1]
  3. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement participates in a public discourse about AI technology, which is a significant societal issue, and does so in a manner that respects free speech and integrity. [+1]