Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64

The statement is part of a public discourse as it engages in a debate about the performance and impact of OpenAI's GPT-4.5, a topic of public interest in the field of AI technology. The tone is confrontational, focusing on the inability of the original poster to acknowledge differing perspectives despite evidence.

  1. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. Instead, it focuses on the perceived inability of the other party to admit being wrong, which can be seen as a personal attack rather than a constructive engagement. This violates the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue without personal attacks. [-2]
  2. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement implies that the other party is unable to acknowledge mistakes, but it does not reflect on the speaker's own potential mistakes or willingness to correct them. This is a minor violation of the principle of acknowledging and correcting one's own mistakes. [-1]