In reply to:
David
@D555555D
ยท
131d
The statement is part of a public discourse on the topic of artificial general intelligence (AGI) and the effectiveness of large language models (LLMs). The conversation involves a critique of efforts to achieve AGI through massive scaling of LLMs, with a response defending the utility of current LLMs despite their limitations. The statement in question suggests reading a paper for further understanding, indicating an intent to provide additional information and context.
- The statement promotes understanding by suggesting further reading to gain a deeper insight into the topic, which aligns with the principle of using words to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.ย [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by providing a resource for further information rather than resorting to personal attacks or dismissive language, which aligns with the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue.ย [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.