In reply to:
Lennart Adolfsson
@LennartAdo22098
·
330d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
331d
The statement by @shellenberger engages in public discourse by addressing international relations and defense policies involving the U.S., Ukraine, and Europe. It questions the obligations and expenditures of the U.S. in protecting Europe and Ukraine, suggesting a lack of mutual respect. The reply by @LennartAdo22098 expresses gratitude for honesty and truth, indicating agreement with the sentiment. The final reply is a simple expression of appreciation, not adding substantive content to the discourse.
- The statement by @shellenberger could be seen as potentially harmful by generalizing the attitudes of entire regions, which might not promote mutual respect. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it frames the relationship in terms of disrespect and obligation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but presents a critical view of international relations.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.