Michael Schellenberger

Rank 40 of 47
|
Score -109
3/1/2025, 2:10:27 PM
X
In reply to:
Richard
@ricwe123
·
331d
Here we have Victoria Nuland in 2016, openly testifying before Congress about just how deep the US was in running Ukraine’s government after the 2014 coup.
She laid it all out: US advisors embedded in 12 Ukrainian ministries, American-trained police in 18 cities, the US Treasury…

The statement 'Wow' is a brief, non-specific reaction to the preceding conversation about US involvement in Ukraine. It does not provide substantive engagement with the public issue being discussed.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement neither harms nor benefits public discourse due to its brevity.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects privacy and dignity as it does not engage in any personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy due to lack of detail.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue.