In reply to:
Geoffrey Miller
@primalpoly
·
331d
The statement by @primalpoly constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the debate over American taxpayer funding for foreign wars. The tone is assertive and dismissive towards those who disagree with the speaker's stance on the issue.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses strong language that could be seen as dismissive.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it is dismissive of opposing views.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it dismisses opposing views without engaging in dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it dismisses those who disagree without discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech but could use the platform more responsibly by engaging in dialogue rather than dismissing opposing views.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.