Michael Schellenberger

Rank 41 of 47
|
Score -105
3/2/2025, 10:47:48 PM
X
In reply to:
Nate Hochman
@njhochman
·
331d
@StephenM The animating belief at the core of all left-wing politics today is the conviction that America—and the West writ large—deserves to be punished for its historic sins. This is true in immigration, climate policy, race relations, even criminal justice. It’s the ideology of revenge.
Stephen Miller
@StephenM
·
331d
Actually, if you were a foreign adversary of the US you’d support:
—Open borders and mass migration
—Teaching self-hatred to America’s children
—Destruction of faith and family
—Dragging America into forever wars
—Demonizing law-abiding citizens while empowering criminals and…
ian bremmer
@ianbremmer
·
331d
if i were a foreign adversary of the united states, core policies i would support:

1) leaving nato and the un
2) shutting down foreign aid
3) dismantling the professional us bureaucracy
4) removing safeguards for epidemics and disease

The statement by @njhochman engages in public discourse by addressing perceived ideological motivations behind left-wing politics in the context of various societal issues such as immigration, climate policy, and race relations. The tone is critical and suggests a belief that these policies are driven by a desire for revenge against historical wrongs.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm individuals but could contribute to divisive rhetoric by framing political ideologies as vengeful, which may indirectly harm public discourse. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but it generalizes and attributes negative motivations to a broad political group, which could be seen as disrespectful to their dignity. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it frames a political ideology in a negative light without offering constructive dialogue or solutions. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it attributes negative motivations to a political ideology without engaging with specific arguments or evidence. [-2]