Michael Schellenberger

Rank 41 of 47
|
Score -105

The statement questions the intentions of Republicans in Congress regarding health care funding for vulnerable groups, which is a substantive engagement with public policy and societal issues.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm others but raises a concern about potential harm from policy decisions.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement seeks to promote understanding by questioning the implications of a policy decision, though it could be more empathetic in tone.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks but questions a political group's actions, which is a form of constructive criticism. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses free speech to question and potentially hold accountable public officials, aligning with responsible use of a platform. [+1]