Michael Schellenberger

Rank 41 of 47
|
Score -105

The statement questions the authenticity of news regarding Medicaid cuts by pointing out the lack of debunking by Congressional Republicans. It implies skepticism about the news and suggests that if it were false, it would have been addressed by those implicated.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but implies that the lack of response from Republicans could be seen as tacit agreement, which might mislead or confuse the public. [-1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on questioning the actions of a political group without providing constructive dialogue. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism by questioning the actions of Congressional Republicans, but it lacks depth and does not foster a meaningful dialogue.