Michael Schellenberger

Rank 41 of 47
|
Score -105
3/4/2025, 11:56:42 AM
X
In reply to:
Wurzelspitze (Autor Era) 🦷🔍👨‍⚕️
@Wurzelspitze
·
331d
@JochenBittner Ganz schön viel Meinungen bei dem Herrn. Überzeugt irgendwie gar nicht.
Jochen Bittner
@JochenBittner
·
331d
Das ist mal das, was Douglas Adams eine "Point of View Gun" nannte.
Es tut weh. Aber man muss es sich geben, um die andere Seite besser zu verstehen.
Natürlich kann man jetzt einwenden, dass die USA sich im Budapester Memorandum 1994 dazu verpflichtet haben, die Souveränität der…
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
334d
Healthy relationships depend on mutual respect. Ukraine and Europe don't respect us; they look down on us. America never had any obligation to protect Ukraine. And now we're asking why we should continue to spend our money, and put our lives on the line, to protect Europe.

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the potential shift in American public opinion regarding NATO, which is a significant geopolitical issue. The tone is dismissive and somewhat confrontational, suggesting a lack of surprise at the perceived ignorance of others.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could be seen as dismissive, potentially causing harm by undermining constructive dialogue. [-1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it dismisses the other party's perspective. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a personal attack by implying ignorance, rather than fostering constructive dialogue. [-1]