Michael Schellenberger

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing international relations and perceptions between the U.S. and Germany. It expresses a sentiment of equality and questions the continued protection of Europe by the U.S., suggesting a perceived lack of respect from Europeans.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement could be seen as potentially harmful by implying a threat to withdraw protection, which might escalate tensions. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It does not respect the dignity of others by suggesting superiority and inferiority between nations. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement lacks empathy and understanding, focusing on perceived disrespect rather than fostering dialogue. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   It engages in a personal attack by suggesting superiority, rather than constructive criticism. [-1]