Michael Schellenberger

Rank 40 of 47
|
Score -105
3/4/2025, 11:59:12 AM
X
In reply to:
Nelena 74
@nelena_74
·
331d
@JochenBittner War die Verpflichtung auf drei Jahre beschränkt? Sind alle vertraglichen Verpflichtungen auf drei Jahre beschränkt? Gut zu wissen.
Jochen Bittner
@JochenBittner
·
331d
Das ist mal das, was Douglas Adams eine "Point of View Gun" nannte.
Es tut weh. Aber man muss es sich geben, um die andere Seite besser zu verstehen.
Natürlich kann man jetzt einwenden, dass die USA sich im Budapester Memorandum 1994 dazu verpflichtet haben, die Souveränität der…
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
334d
Healthy relationships depend on mutual respect. Ukraine and Europe don't respect us; they look down on us. America never had any obligation to protect Ukraine. And now we're asking why we should continue to spend our money, and put our lives on the line, to protect Europe.

The statement 'It’s been nearly 80 years. And maybe 80 years is enough' appears to reference historical obligations or commitments, possibly related to international relations or defense agreements. It suggests a reconsideration of long-standing commitments, which is a topic of public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as dismissive of historical commitments, which might indirectly affect international relations. [-1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement lacks empathy and understanding towards the complexities of international obligations and the historical context. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue or provide a rationale for the reconsideration of commitments, which could lead to misunderstandings. [-1]