Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47

Score 83

@emollick @ezraklein They also need to consider the possibility that it is false; Ezra, who I usually love, fell short in that regard.

I will discuss tomorrow in my newsletter.

3/4/2025, 7:31:03 PM

In reply to:

Ethan Mollick

@emollick

299d

I wish more people were taking seriously the possibility that @ezraklein and the leadership of the AI labs are raising: that AGI is a real possibility in the near future.

You don't have to buy it yourself, but leaders & policymakers need to consider the possibility it is true.

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the implications of artificial general intelligence (AGI) and the responsibilities of leaders and policymakers in considering its potential. The reply critiques a public figure's approach to the topic, suggesting a need for skepticism and further discussion.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement encourages critical thinking and consideration of multiple perspectives, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by promoting a balanced view. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
By planning to discuss the topic further in a newsletter, the statement aims to promote understanding and dialogue, aligning with the principle of fostering empathy and compassion. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The critique of Ezra Klein is constructive, focusing on the content of his argument rather than personal attacks, aligning with the principle of engaging in constructive criticism. [+1]