In reply to:
Walter Kirn
@walterkirn
·
205d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the environmental and policy issue of large-scale forest clearing, which is a significant public concern. The tone is one of sadness and concern, questioning the impact of such actions on the environment.
- The statement does not use harmful language and expresses concern over environmental harm, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes empathy and understanding by expressing sadness over the environmental impact, aligning with the principle of promoting empathy and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, aligning with the principle of constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By questioning the environmental impact, the statement uses influence to raise awareness about a societal issue, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a public issue, aligning with the principle of responsible platform use. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.