In reply to:
Matt - grain-fed Corporatist 🇺🇸 🇮🇱 🇰🇷
@mbrown758
·
205d
Walter Kirn
@walterkirn
·
205d
The statement by @mbrown758 challenges the notion of sustainable logging by highlighting the scale of deforestation, suggesting that cutting down forests almost three times the size of California is unsustainable. This engages with public discourse on environmental policy and sustainable practices.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on the issue of sustainability, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By questioning the sustainability of large-scale logging, the statement promotes understanding and awareness of environmental concerns. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by challenging the previous claim about sustainable logging without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to raise awareness about environmental sustainability, contributing to societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly questioning a public policy issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.