Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement questions Elon Musk's commitment to Tesla and its projects, particularly focusing on the company's direction in electric vehicles and self-driving technology. It critiques Musk's decisions and suggests a lack of confidence in Tesla's future, which engages with public discourse on corporate leadership and innovation in the automotive industry.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not use harmful language but questions Musk's commitment, which is a legitimate critique in public discourse.
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning Musk's decisions and their implications for Tesla, without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses the platform to discuss a public figure's influence on a major company, which is a responsible use of free speech. [+1]