Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83
3/7/2025, 5:37:18 PM
X
In reply to:
Mark Blair
@mblair
·
311d
@GaryMarcus @elonmusk I think it is more likely he realized the regulatory environment was going to be a big constraint on everything he seeks to accomplish in his various companies, and rolled up his sleeves to elbow himself into a position of influence.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
311d
About a year ago, I asked whether @elonmusk had mentally checked out of Tesla.

Maybe I was right?
• He gave up on the cheap model. Doesn’t seem to care much about EVs per se anymore.
• The fall robotaxi demo was underwhelming; robots were teleoperated.
• In recent months, he…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
649d
Conjecture: Elon has given up on Tesla.

He once said that “Solving self-driving was the difference between Tesla being worth a lot of money and being worth basically zero”

And now he has just let the vision lead at the FSD project walk out the door, without matching comp. He…

The statement is part of a public discourse as it engages in a discussion about Elon Musk's business decisions and their implications, which are of public interest given his influence on technology and industry. The tone is speculative and conversational, contributing to a broader debate about Musk's strategic priorities.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm; it is speculative and does not contain harmful language. [+1]
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in dialogue without personal attacks, maintaining a focus on business strategy rather than personal attributes. [+1]
  3. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement contributes to public discourse responsibly, engaging in a discussion about a public figure's business decisions. [+1]