Marianne Williamson

Rank 8 of 47
|
Score 122
3/7/2025, 6:21:37 PM
X
In reply to:
vic proulx
@curtisrobin
·
206d
@marwilliamson Yeah, well, $750 to every homeowner who lost everything in New Palestine, Lahaina, and western NC, while not in the millions, is the same spirit.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
206d
America has made a lot of mistakes, even perpetrated criminal horrors such as illegal wars, but never in my lifetime has the government of the United States gleefully and systemically perpetrated trauma and abuse on millions of our own citizens the way it is now. 3/3
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
206d
The sociopaths in charge are BRAGGING about cutting Social Security and Medicaid, like little boys who cut up frogs and laugh. This is emotional abuse being perpetrated on people in need, under the cynical guise of "economic responsibility" – when in fact they are STEALING the…
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
206d
Interrupting Social Security benefits might not seem like much to Elon Musk - after all, he calls those who rely on such programs as "the parasite class" - but to millions of older and disabled Americans it means whether or not they will HAVE ENOUGH TO EAT, CAN BUY NEEDED…

The statement 'But that is the point' is a brief response in a larger conversation about government actions and their impact on citizens, particularly in the context of social security and disaster relief. The conversation involves criticism of government policies and their effects on vulnerable populations, which constitutes public discourse as it addresses societal issues and public concerns.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement itself is neutral and does not directly cause harm, but it is part of a conversation that includes strong language and accusations, which could be seen as harmful if not substantiated.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not directly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it is part of a dialogue that aims to highlight issues affecting citizens, which could foster empathy if approached constructively.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement is a simple agreement or acknowledgment and does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a neutral tone. [+1]