Marianne Williamson

Rank 8 of 47
|
Score 122
3/7/2025, 6:34:02 PM
X
In reply to:
Danielle B
@Maggiemay1870
·
206d
@marwilliamson Unfortunately, Marianne, it's either they cut some now or the entire thing goes away. The entitlement programs have been used on lazy or drug addled people who are able bodied, and people like myself who's been working since a young age will probably never get it.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
206d
Interrupting Social Security benefits might not seem like much to Elon Musk - after all, he calls those who rely on such programs as "the parasite class" - but to millions of older and disabled Americans it means whether or not they will HAVE ENOUGH TO EAT, CAN BUY NEEDED…

The statement is a direct response to a conversation about Social Security benefits, a significant public issue. The tone is confrontational, challenging the previous claim about entitlement programs being misused. The intent is to refute the narrative that Social Security is being exploited by undeserving individuals and to assert that those who have worked will receive benefits.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but is confrontational, which could be seen as dismissive of the other person's concerns. It neither significantly aligns with nor violates the principle.
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement challenges the other person's narrative but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It adheres to the principle of engaging in dialogue, albeit in a confrontational manner. [+1]