In reply to:
American Trinity
@janethinde
·
206d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
207d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a significant public issue, namely the potential cuts to Medicaid, and responds to a claim made in a public conversation. The tone is informative and aims to provide evidence to counter a previous assertion.
- The statement strives to do no harm by providing factual information about the potential impact of the House budget on Medicaid. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by linking to a resource that offers detailed analysis and evidence regarding the budget's impact on Medicaid. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a specific claim with evidence, rather than resorting to personal attacks. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly using a platform to share information that contributes to public understanding of a policy issue. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.