In reply to:
Logic
@funndamentalz
·
206d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the perceived fairness of political processes within a party, specifically regarding Bernie Sanders' primary campaigns. It suggests that external influences affected the outcomes, which is a substantive engagement with public issues related to electoral integrity and party politics.
- The statement implies wrongdoing by the party but does not use harmful language. It maintains a critical tone without direct harm, adhering to the principle. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It critiques a process rather than individuals, respecting the dignity of others. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but rather critiques a perceived systemic issue. It does not foster constructive dialogue as it presents an accusation without evidence or invitation for discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.