Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement criticizes the actions of New York Times employees and their response to a journalist's exploration of the lab leak theory, suggesting that accusations of racism were used to suppress the pursuit of truth. The tone is accusatory and suggests a conflict between journalistic integrity and internal activism.
- The statement implies harm was done to a journalist's career due to internal activism, suggesting a violation of the principle to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement accuses employees of using accusations of racism as a tool, which could be seen as disrespectful to their dignity and privacy, potentially violating this principle. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on blame and accusation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead it makes a personal attack on the employees' motives. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement engages in public discourse by addressing issues of journalistic integrity and internal newsroom dynamics, but it does so in a manner that may not uphold the integrity of free speech by focusing on personal attacks. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.