Reposted by Jake Tapper š¦
The statement criticizes elected officials for meeting with David Miscavige, suggesting that such meetings legitimize a controversial figure associated with serious allegations. The tone is accusatory and aims to hold public officials accountable for their actions.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful, but it is directed at public officials in the context of accountability, which is a common aspect of public discourse.Ā [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does use strong language to criticize public officials.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue or criticism, as it uses personal attacks by calling officials a 'disgrace.'Ā [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement attempts to use influence to hold public officials accountable, which can be seen as an effort to better society by promoting transparency and accountability.Ā [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech to criticize public officials, which is a responsible use of the platform in the context of civic engagement.Ā [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.