In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
324d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
324d
The statement is part of a public discourse on the alleged weaponization of the Justice Department by President Trump. It engages with a significant political issue, contributing to the civic dialogue.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but is part of a contentious debate.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the broader conversation involves accusations that could affect reputations.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it is part of a polarized debate. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but is part of a broader accusatory narrative.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.