Michael Schellenberger

Rank 38 of 47
|
Score -88
3/18/2025, 2:55:36 PM
X
In reply to:
Liberty75167
@Kimberl96942948
·
322d
@shellenberger @StephenM So they should’ve turned the plane around?
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
322d
Every single Trump advisor, including and especially @StephenM, knows perfectly well that what they did is unconstitutional.
Rapid Response 47
@RapidResponse47
·
323d
WATCH IN FULL: White House Deputy Chief of Staff @StephenM schools Fake News CNN's @kasie on the Constitution, the separation of powers, and the rule of law.

The statement is part of a conversation about a political issue involving constitutional actions by a public figure. It appears to be a sarcastic or critical remark about a decision related to a political event. The tone is informal and possibly mocking, but it does not engage deeply with the substantive issues at hand.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but may contribute to a dismissive tone.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy but may not fully respect dignity due to its sarcastic nature. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it is more focused on criticism. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and leans towards sarcasm rather than substantive critique. [-1]