Michael Schellenberger

Rank 38 of 47
|
Score -88
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
325d
President Donald Trump is weaponizing the Justice Department to persecute his political enemies, say the media. “Trump calls for jailing his perceived opponents in Justice Department speech,” reported NBC. “The president intends to bend the vast powers of federal law enforcement…
3/18/2025, 3:03:16 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
322d
It's up to the courts not the Administration to determine whether it is non-justiciable. The administration must comply with the order until a higher court reverses it or sets it aside. That's how our system works.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
322d
Every single Trump advisor, including and especially @StephenM, knows perfectly well that what they did is unconstitutional.
Rapid Response 47
@RapidResponse47
·
323d
WATCH IN FULL: White House Deputy Chief of Staff @StephenM schools Fake News CNN's @kasie on the Constitution, the separation of powers, and the rule of law.

The statement critiques the Trump administration's actions as unconstitutional and warns of potential loss of legitimacy and public support. It engages in public discourse by addressing governmental actions and their implications for democracy and free speech diplomacy.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to hold the administration accountable, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm by advocating for constitutional adherence. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By discussing the potential consequences of unconstitutional actions, the statement promotes understanding of the importance of legitimacy and public support in governance. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement critiques the administration's actions without engaging in personal attacks, focusing on policy and legal implications. [+1]