Michael Schellenberger

Rank 39 of 47
|
Score -96
3/18/2025, 3:05:07 PM
X
In reply to:
Coustain
@Coustain
·
322d
@shellenberger @StephenM Just because you say so doesn’t make it so. What’s your reasoning that it was unconstitutional? Let’s see some logic in your assertion, rather than merely stating an opinion without bothering to back it up with reason and facts.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
322d
Every single Trump advisor, including and especially @StephenM, knows perfectly well that what they did is unconstitutional.
Rapid Response 47
@RapidResponse47
·
323d
WATCH IN FULL: White House Deputy Chief of Staff @StephenM schools Fake News CNN's @kasie on the Constitution, the separation of powers, and the rule of law.

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the balance of powers and the ability of a president to defy court orders, which are significant constitutional issues.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and focuses on a factual aspect of the balance of powers. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by explaining why a president cannot defy court orders, contributing to a clearer understanding of constitutional principles. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a specific point in the conversation without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]