In reply to:
Mollie
@MZHemingway
·
322d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
322d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the constitutional balance of powers and questioning the actions of the Trump administration in relation to a judge's orders. It raises concerns about adherence to the rule of law, which is a significant public issue.
- The statement questions the potential harm of defying judicial orders, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By invoking the Constitution and balance of powers, it promotes understanding of legal principles. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement challenges the actions of the administration without resorting to personal attacks, adhering to constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.