Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
322d
In reply to:
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the adherence to constitutional principles and the separation of powers. It questions the actions of public officials in relation to court orders, implying a potential undermining of constitutional norms.
- The statement raises concerns about adherence to constitutional principles, which aligns with striving to do no harm by promoting accountability. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It questions public officials' actions without engaging in personal attacks, respecting their dignity while critiquing their actions. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the adherence to constitutional norms, avoiding personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.