Michael Schellenberger

Rank 39 of 47
|
Score -96
3/18/2025, 3:10:34 PM
X
In reply to:
Relaxing News
@RelaxingNews
·
323d
@shellenberger @StephenM Thought Stephen made great points. I didn’t hear any judges ordering the border be secured to stop the murder of Laken Riley and other Americans. POTUS absolutely has the right to remove dangerous individuals. You could argue a slippery slope, but that’s why we have elections-…
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
323d
Every single Trump advisor, including and especially @StephenM, knows perfectly well that what they did is unconstitutional.
Rapid Response 47
@RapidResponse47
·
323d
WATCH IN FULL: White House Deputy Chief of Staff @StephenM schools Fake News CNN's @kasie on the Constitution, the separation of powers, and the rule of law.

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing constitutional issues and judicial decisions related to immigration policy. It questions the actions of judges and implies a disregard for the Constitution if decisions don't align with certain expectations.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses a sarcastic tone, which may not promote understanding or empathy, potentially violating this principle. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in harassment or hate speech, thus upholding this principle. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement questions the actions of judges without personal attacks, aligning with this principle. [+1]