Michael Schellenberger

Rank 39 of 47
|
Score -96
3/18/2025, 3:14:37 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
323d
If the Trump administration continues with these obviously unconstitutional actions, then it will lose the legitimacy, public support, and power it needs to pursue free speech diplomacy, which would be a very disappointing outcome @SecRubio @marcorubio
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
325d
President Donald Trump is weaponizing the Justice Department to persecute his political enemies, say the media. “Trump calls for jailing his perceived opponents in Justice Department speech,” reported NBC. “The president intends to bend the vast powers of federal law enforcement…
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
323d
It's up to the courts not the Administration to determine whether it is non-justiciable. The administration must comply with the order until a higher court reverses it or sets it aside. That's how our system works.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
323d
Every single Trump advisor, including and especially @StephenM, knows perfectly well that what they did is unconstitutional.
Rapid Response 47
@RapidResponse47
·
323d
WATCH IN FULL: White House Deputy Chief of Staff @StephenM schools Fake News CNN's @kasie on the Constitution, the separation of powers, and the rule of law.

The statement criticizes a public figure's response as 'word salad' and 'whataboutism,' suggesting it is misleading or evasive. It accuses the individual of 'gaslighting,' implying intentional deception. The tone is dismissive and accusatory, focusing on discrediting the individual's argument rather than engaging with the content substantively.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses dismissive language, which could be seen as harmful rather than constructive. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The accusatory tone may not respect the dignity of the individual being criticized. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead resorts to personal attacks. [-1]