In reply to:
CRYPTQSANTA
@GQDWINS2024
·
126d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
126d
The statement is part of a conversation that engages with public issues, specifically government control and potential misuse of power, which constitutes public discourse. The tone of the statement is dismissive and implies skepticism towards the previous comment about government waste and fraud.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but it dismisses the concerns raised without providing constructive input, which could be seen as a missed opportunity to engage positively.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does not show respect for differing opinions, which could be seen as a lack of respect for the dignity of others. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It dismisses the previous comment without providing a reasoned argument or evidence, which could be seen as a form of personal attack or ad hominem argument. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.