In reply to:
Russell Polo
@RussellPolo
·
125d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
125d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of government agency cuts and the influence of corporate powers, which are significant public concerns. The tone is critical and challenges the narrative of waste and corruption in government agencies, redirecting the blame towards corporate and billionaire influences.
- The statement does not use harmful language but rather critiques a narrative, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on systemic issues rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement attempts to promote understanding by redirecting the blame from government agencies to corporate powers, fostering a broader perspective on the issue. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by challenging the narrative presented by others, without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly using the platform to discuss public issues and challenge prevailing narratives. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.