Michael Schellenberger

Rank 40 of 47
|
Score -95
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
339d
The US government didn’t censor anyone, said the media. But it did. Not only that, it worked with other nations to do so. Now, the US government has not only repudiated censorship, it’s put free speech at the center of its foreign policy. Thank you and bravo @SecRubio !
3/20/2025, 4:04:42 AM
X

The statement and conversation engage in public discourse by addressing the issue of government censorship and free speech as a matter of public policy. The tone is critical of past actions and supportive of recent changes in policy, highlighting a shift towards prioritizing free speech in foreign policy.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm and instead promotes a positive change in policy, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy by acknowledging past issues and supporting a shift towards free speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to advocate for societal betterment by supporting free speech as a policy priority. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech principles by advocating for its centrality in foreign policy. [+2]