Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
322d
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
322d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
322d
Tricia McLaughlin
@TriciaOhio
·
322d
The statement critiques a legal action, suggesting it contradicts the nation's commitment to free speech and implies that those supporting it are motivated by improper reasons. It engages in public discourse by addressing issues of legality, free speech, and motivations behind legal actions.
- The statement suggests harm is being done to free speech principles, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by advocating against perceived injustice. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in personal attacks, though it implies negative motives of others.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting concerns about free speech. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism by questioning the motives behind the legal action without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.