Michael Schellenberger

Rank 40 of 47
|
Score -95
3/20/2025, 4:14:09 AM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
322d
“We must stop censorship and suppression of information.” @SecRubio 💯🎯

I miss that guy
Senior Official for Public Diplomacy
@UnderSecPD
·
342d
“We must stop censorship and suppression of information. The State Department’s efforts to combat malign propaganda have expanded and fundamentally changed since the Cold War era and we must reprioritize truth. The State Department I lead will support and defend Americans’ rights…
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
322d
Was fun while it lasted!
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
322d
Maybe it’s legal or maybe it’s illegal. The courts will decide. But it’s not right. And it’s not in the spirit of our nation’s commitment to free speech. And most everyone praising this action knows it’s not right and are succumbing to baser motives.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
322d
Free Speech Diplomacy, R.I.P.

March 3, 2025 - March 19, 2025
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
339d
The US government didn’t censor anyone, said the media. But it did. Not only that, it worked with other nations to do so. Now, the US government has not only repudiated censorship, it’s put free speech at the center of its foreign policy. Thank you and bravo @SecRubio !

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing issues of censorship and free speech, particularly in the context of international relations and government actions. It implies criticism of perceived censorship by Brazil and Europe, suggesting a defense of American citizens' rights.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm but implies criticism of other nations' actions, which could be seen as confrontational.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding of free speech issues but does so in a somewhat sarcastic tone, which may not foster empathy. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue, using a sarcastic tone that may undermine serious discussion. [-1]