Michael Schellenberger

The statement involves a discussion about the arrest and potential deportation of an academic, touching on issues of free speech, association, and potential discrimination based on political views. It raises questions about the legality and ethics of the actions taken by immigration authorities.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement questions the legality and fairness of the actions taken, potentially highlighting harm caused by these actions. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It respects privacy by not revealing personal details beyond what is necessary for the discussion. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement promotes understanding by questioning the rationale behind the actions and encouraging dialogue. [+1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   It engages in constructive criticism by questioning the actions of DHS without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses its platform to highlight potential misuse of power and advocate for fair treatment. [+1]